Authority or Competence of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) on Dispute Subjects in Indonesia

Sri Wahyuni Ermawati

doi:10.58355/justices.v3i1.7

Authors

Sri Wahyuni Ermawati Fakultas Syariah, IAIN Pontianak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v3i1.7

Keywords:

Authority, Subject and Object of Dispute, State Administrative Court.

Abstract

The authority or competence possessed by PTUN includes absolute competence and relative competence. The absolute competence of PTUN can be seen from the point of view of the object, material or subject matter of the dispute, namely relating to the issuance of policies from TUN bodies or officials in the form of written decrees or decisions. Meanwhile, relative competence is related to the location or jurisdiction of the court itself, as well as the parties to the dispute. Based on Article 1 point (8) of Law 51/2009, the subjects of disputes in the PTUN are individuals or civil legal entities and TUN bodies or officials. Meanwhile, the object of the dispute is the TUN Decision, which is a written determination issued by a TUN body or official based on applicable laws and regulations, which is concrete, individual and final, which can give rise to legal consequences for a person or civil legal entity. This is stated in Article 1 number (9) of Law 51/2009.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, A. (2015). Teori dan Praktik Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Pasca Amandemen. Prenadamedia Group.

Aspani, B. (1986). Kompetensi Absolut Dan Relatif Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun (Vol. 16), 344-352. https:// jurnal.unpal.ac.id/index.php/solusi/article/view/142/120

Harahap, M. Y. (2005). Hukum Aara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan. Sinar Grafika.

Harahap, Z. (2015). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Revisi, Vol. 9). Rajawali Pers.

Marbun, S. F. (2003). Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Liberty.

Nata, S. (1998). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Rajawali .

Panjaitan, B. S. (2016). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. CV Manhaji.

Riza, D. (2019). Hakikat KTUN Menurut Undang-undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Vs Undang-undang Admnistrasi Pemerintahan. Soumatera Law Review, 2(2), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.22216/souml aw.v2i2.3566

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2003). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. PT Grafindo Persada.

Sofi Yuliniar. (2023). Principles of State Administrative Court In Indonesia. JUSTICES: Journal of Law, 2(2), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i2.27

Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2004 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 5076)

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1986 Nomor 77)

Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahin 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5079)

Umi Qalsum. (2023). The Role Of The Indonesian Constitutional Court For Adjudication Of Economic, Social Rights And Effective Culture. JUSTICES: Journal of Law, 2(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i1.32

Wantu, F. M. (2014). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Reviva Cendekia.

Yanto, N. (2015). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Teori dan Prakteknya di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia. Mitra Wacana Media.