Regarding Decisions and Legal Efforts at the State Administrative Court

Masrufah; Arif Wibowo

doi:10.58355/justices.v4i1.41

Authors

Masrufah Fakultas Syariah, IAIN Pontianak
Arif Wibowo Fakultas Syariah IAIN Pontianak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v4i1.41

Keywords:

Decision, Legal Remedies, State Administrative Court

Abstract

Indonesia as a rule of law requires all actions or deeds of the authorities, therefore Indonesia has an independent judiciary in administering judicial power to uphold the law. In Indonesia, the State Administrative Court was formed with the aim of realizing the nation's and state's life order which guarantees the equality of citizens in the law. The research method used at this writing is to use normative legal research methods. where normative legal research here can be interpreted as research aimed at examining the quality of the legal norms themselves. In the state administrative court, of course, there are matters regarding decisions and legal remedies. Therefore it can be defined that a decision according to the legal dictionary is the result of examining a case. Meanwhile, the implementation of decisions in law is a determinant of the success of the judicial control system on government attitudes and actions in the system of public protection against government actions. In addition to the existence of a decision, it is also accompanied by legal remedies where legal remedies are the right of the defeated party not to accept the court's decision, in the form of resistance or appeal or cassation or the right to submit a request for review in the case of demanding the method stipulated in the law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, Ujang. “Penerapan Upaya Hukum Paksa Berupa Pembayaran Uang Paksa di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.”

Aisyah, Nur. Buku Ajar Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Deepublish, Yogyakarta, 2015.

Hasibuan, Ahmad Dahlan. et.al. “Faktor penyebab Tidak Dilaksanakannya Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dan Upaya Penanggulangannya (Analisis Kasus Putusan PTUN Medan No: 17/G/2000/PTUN-MDN) Jurnal Mercatoria, Vol. 6 No. 2 (2013): 141.

Indroharto. Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. (Jakarta: Pusat Sinar Harapan, 1993)

Lubna, L. “Upaya Paksa Pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Memberikan Perlindungan Hukum kepada Masyarakat” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, Vol. 3, No. 1. (2015): 159-171.

Prodjohamidjojo, Martiman. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. (Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1996).

Rahmadinata, Keken. “Pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara,” (2022).

Rani, Uwaisyah, Gusliana Hb, dan Junaidi. Urgensi Upaya Paksa Dalam Pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Diss. Riau University, 2014.

Sari, Tessya Putri Permata, “Pelaksanaan Putusan pengadilan tata Usaha Negara.” (2021)

Sunge, Maisara. “Efektifitas Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara”, Inovasi, Volume 6, Nomor 4 (2009): 70-83.

Supomo, R. Hukum Acara Perdata Pengadilan Negeri. (Jakarta: Pradaya Paramita, 1984).

Titik Triwulandari, Ismu Gunandi Widodo, Hukum Tata Usaha Neagara dan Hukum Acara Peradilan tata Usaha Neagara Indonesia, (Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2018).

Wahyunadi, Yodi Martono. “Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Konteks Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan”. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan. Volume 5, Nomer1(2016): 135-154.

Yuslim. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakatra: Sinar Grafika, 2015.