Implementation of the Principle of Justice for Crime Victims in the Criminal Procedure Process in Indonesia Based on the Perspective of Natural Law Philosophy

Fahrizal S.Siagian

doi:10.58355/justices.v4i4.215

Authors

Fahrizal S.Siagian Doctoral in Law Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v4i4.215

Keywords:

Philosophy of Law, Crime, Victims, Restitution

Abstract

The implementation of the principle of justice for crime victims in the criminal justice process is a crucial issue in efforts to reform criminal law in Indonesia. The perspective of Natural Law Philosophy provides a strong normative foundation through the idea that every human being has natural rights that must be respected by the state, including the right of victims to obtain just redress. This study examines the extent to which Natural Law principles, such as moral justice, respect for human dignity, and balance of rights, are reflected in policies and practices for protecting crime victims. The method used is a normative juridical approach through analysis of relevant laws and regulations, doctrines, and court decisions. The results of the study indicate that although positive legal instruments such as the Witness and Victim Protection Law, provisions on restitution and compensation, and assistance mechanisms have accommodated victims' rights, their implementation remains inadequate. Barriers arise in the form of limited access, minimal understanding among law enforcement officials, and suboptimal service providers. These imperfections create a gap between the ideals of natural justice and positive sentencing practices. This research emphasizes the need to prioritize reformulating sentencing policies that are more oriented toward victim recovery so that the Indonesian legal system aligns with the universal values of Natural Law Philosophy and is able to deliver substantive justice in every law enforcement process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afifah, F., & Mahyani, A. (2022). Restitusi terhadap korban tindak pidana perdagangan orang. JHP 17, Jurnal Hasil Penelitian, 6(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30996/jhp17.v6i2.6235

Anggraeni, D., & Damayanti, N. (2022). Penegakan Hukum yang Berkeadilan di Indonesia. Uns, 1(2), hlm 3-5.

Asis, L. F. (2023). Konsep Keadilan : Pendekatan Filsafat Hukum. TARUNALAW: Journal of Law and Syariah, 01(02), 184–191. https://journal.staitaruna.ac.id/index.php/jls/article/view/160

Deassy J.A. Hehanussa, M. G. et. a. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum. In E. Jaelani (Ed.), Jurnal Widina Bhakti Persada (Vol. 4, Issue 3). Widina Bhakti Persada Bandung. https://medium.com/@arifwicaksanaa/pengertian-use-case-a7e576e1b6bf%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100642

Fuad, M. B. (2023, August 3). Restitusi Korban, Jauh Panggang dari Api. Kompas.

Gaarder, E. (2017). Restorative justice. The Routledge Companion to Criminological Theory and Concepts, 480–484. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315744902-108

Hasan, Z., & Al, A. Y. (2024). Restitusi Sebagai Upaya Pemulihan Hak Korban Dalam Sudut Pandang Hukum Pidana. Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 5(11), 81–90.

Hutomo, P., & Soge, M. M. (2021). Perspektif Teori Sistem Hukum Dalam Pembaharuan Pengaturan Sistem Pemasyarakatan Militer. Legacy: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundang-Undangan, 1(1), 46–68. https://doi.org/10.21274/legacy.2021.1.1.46-68

Karsa, K., Indah, S., Marseli, D., & Bazari, S. (2023). Pemikiran Hukum John Locke Dan Landasan. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 2(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.11111/dassollen.xxxxxxx

Lubis, A. R., Fauzia, I., & Arifin, T. (2023). Reviewing Victimology in the Doxing Case of an Indonesian Virtual Youtuber. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 2(6), 2559–2572. https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v2i6.460

Marasabessy Fauzy. (2015). Restitusi Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana : Sebuah Tawaran Mekanisme Baru. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 45(1). https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jhpAvailableat:https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jhp/vol45/iss1/3

Meliala, N. C. (n.d.). UPAYA MELIBATKAN PARTISIPASI KORBAN DAN PELAKU PIDANA. 111–135.

Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press.

Mukti, S. P. Q. W., & Habibullah, A. W. (2025). Prosedur Hukum dalam Mendapatkan Hak Pemulihan bagi Korban. Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(3), 24–36.

Mulyadi, M., Rosmalinda, & et.al. (2024). Restitusi: Hak Mutlak Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana. USU Press.

Nurhaurima, S., Koto, Z., & Dewi, D. S. (2021). Hak Restitusi Bagi Anak Korban Tindak Pidana. Journal of Legal Research, 3(4), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v3i4.21689

Purbacaraka, Purnadi, S. S. (1985). Ikhtisan antinomi : aliran filsafat sebagai landasan filsafat hukum. Rajawali.

Pushampol UISU. (2025). Focus Group Discussion Tentang Politik Hukum Kewenangan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana dalam RKUHAP.

Putra, P. S., & S.Siagian, F. (2025). The Capability of Artificial Intelligence in Calculating the Losses of Crime Victims. Kosmik Hukum, 25(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v25i2.25817

Royani, E., & Gultom, J. (2025). Buku ajar filsafat hukum (Issue March). Lingkar Edukasi Indonesia.

Siagian, F. S., Mulyadi, M., & Rosmalinda. (2024). Criminal Law Policy Concerning Providing Restitution To Victims Of Crimes Of Serious. Semarang Law Review, 5(2), 13–36. file:///C:/Users/Administrator/Downloads/39613-98293-1-PB.pdf

Sitompul, R. M., & Maysarah, A. (2021). Initiating Payment of Trafficking Restitution from a Victims Perspective. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 23(1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v23i1.18276

St Thomas Aquinas on Natural Law and Rule of Law. (2023). Philosophy Models. https://philosophy-models.blog/

Sulistiani, L. (2022). Problematika Hak Restitusi Korban Pada Tindak Pidana Yang Diatur Kuhp Dan Di Luar Kuhp. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 7(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v7i1.948