Settlement of Village Apparatus Selection Dispute through the State Administrative Court

Jhoniansyah

doi:10.58355/justices.v2i3.13

Authors

Jhoniansyah Fakultas Syariah IAIN Pontianak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i3.13

Keywords:

iPenyelesaianiseleksiisengketaiperangkatidesa,iPeradilaniTataiUsahaiNegara.

Abstract

In adjudicating disputes, judges at the State Administrative Court have the main duties of examining, adjudicating and resolving cases. In developments in society, the principle of active judges needs to be widely understood in order to provide justice. In this writing, the authors use normative law research methods (normative law research). After discussing the existing problems, it can be concluded that the State Administrative Court handles disputes that arise. state administration or state administration officials. Obstacles in the process of finalizing the selection through the State Administrative Court, the Plaintiff was not ready when he filed the lawsuit, Obstacles that generally occur at the Dismiss al Procedure stage of the State Administration when a summons has been made to the plaintiff and the defendant to be asked for an explanation by the chairman of the plaintiff's court is unable to attend and The regulations governing the selection of village officials are overlapping and lacking in detail. The State Administrative Dispute Settlement Process is carried out in two ways, namely through administrative efforts and through lawsuits to the State Administrative Court.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah G,. (2014). Teori dan praktik hukum acara peradilan tata usaha Negara, h.48. Malang: Tunggal Mandiri.

Abrori, Muzammilul. PTUN Kabulkan Gugatan Soal 5 Perangkat Desa Kuala Dua yang Diduga Diberhentikan Sepihak oleh Kades, dikutip dari https://pontianak.tribunnews.com/2021/04/05/ptun- kabulkan-gugatan-soal-5-perangkat-desa-kuala-dua-yang-diduga-diberhentikan-sepihak-oleh kades.

Agus Suwandono, & Deviana Yuanitasari. (2023). Perkembangan Penyalahgunaan Keadaan Sebagai Dasar Pembatalan Perjanjian Dalam Sistem Hukum Perjanjian Di Indonesia. JUSTICES: Journal of Law, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i1.31

Azzahrawi, dkk. (2019). “Wewenang Dan Kendala Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Kepegawaian Setelah Upaya Administratif”, Syiah Kuala Law Journal: Vol. 3, No.2 Agustus

Effendi, Jonaedi, & Johny Ibrahim. (2016) Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris Edisi Pertama,. Depok: Prenadamedia Group.

Fahrudin Rasyid, “Pengabaian Penerapan Sanksi oleh Pejabat Berwenang terhadap Pelanggaran Disiplin Berat Pegawai Negeri Sipil”, Legal Research, Faculty of Law Halu Oleo University, Volume 1 Issue 1 April 2019.

Gunadi, G. (2018) “PERJANJIAN PERKAWINAN MENURUT KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA DAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 1974”, al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies, 1(1), pp. 121–148. doi: 10.31943/afkar_journal.v1i1.11.

Hutagalung, S, M, .(2019). Praktik Peradilan Perdata, Kepailitan, & Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jakarta Timur: Sinar Grafika, Offset.

Jonaedi Effendi dan Johny Ibrahim, Metode Penelitian hukum Normatif dan Empiris Edisi Pertama, (Depok: Prenadamedia Group, 2016).

Pasal 24 ayat (1) Undang-undang Dasar Negara Indonesia Tahun 1945

Putriyanti, A, Prinsip Hakim Aktif (Domini Litis Principle) Dalam Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara”, Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jilid 42 No.3 Tahun 2013

Sonata, Depri L. (2014). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris: Karakteristik Khas Dari Metode Meneliti Hukum. FIAT JUSTITIA,Vol. 8,(No.1), pp.15-35

Sri Wahyuni, & Arif Wibowo. (2023). Authority, Subject and Object of the Dispute At the State Administrative Court (PTUN). JUSTICES: Journal of Law, 2(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v2i1.8

Suriadinata Vincent, Asas Presumptio Iustae Causa dalam KTUN: Penundaan Pelaksanaan KTUN Oleh Hakim Peradilan Umum”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2018,

Tampubolon, B. (2022). Strategi Menangani dan Memenangkan Perkara Pidana Di Pengadilan (Persepektif Advokat) Edisi Pertama. Jakarta: Kencana.

Teguh, H.,P,. & Ojarudin, R,. (2022). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Yogyakarta : CV. Andi Offset.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1986 Nomor 77, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3344).

Wahyunadi. (2016). Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Konteks Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 5(1), 135–154. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/ JHP.5.1.2016.135-154.

Wiyono. R, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015).